<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Analysis of Johnson O'Malley Allocations and Proposed Formulas in 1976</dc:title><dc:date>1974-01-01</dc:date><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:identifier>http://congressarchives.org/record/CAC_CC_003_2_34_6_0005</dc:identifier><dc:description>The memo discusses Johnson O'Malley (JOM) allocations, comparing the BIA formula with the proposed Quie formula. It explains that the BIA formula is not equitable for all states and suggests using the Quie formula instead. The memo also highlights the importance of involving Indian leaders in the decision-making process and emphasizes the need for improved support for Indian children attending public schools. The attached breakdown of JOM funding shows how different states would benefit from the proposed ESEA Title I type formula.</dc:description></oai_dc:dc>