<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Allowing Non-Attorneys to Represent Parties before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission: A Decision Update</dc:title><dc:date>1977-02-21</dc:date><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:identifier>http://congressarchives.org/record/CAC_CC_017_3_170_13_0011</dc:identifier><dc:description>Congressman Glenn English contacted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) on behalf of Bill Finley regarding proposed noise regulations. OSHA provided information on the proposed revisions to the noise exposure standard, including maintaining the 90 dB(A) average exposure limit and requirements for noise control. OSHA is carefully analyzing the information and arguments before making final determinations on the revised standard. Congressman English also contacted the United States Department of Labor to inquire about the response from OSHA. Overall, there is ongoing discussion and consideration of the potential impact of the noise regulations on industries and employees.</dc:description></oai_dc:dc>