<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Request for Comments on FPDS Evaluation</dc:title><dc:date>1983-09-30</dc:date><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:identifier>http://congressarchives.org/record/CAC_CC_017_3_170_28_0005</dc:identifier><dc:description>Glenn English, a member of the United States House of Representatives, received a response from the Office of Management and Budget regarding a concern raised by a constituent. The response addressed the issue of small business set-asides in federal procurement. It explained the legality of these set-asides and the process by which the Federal Acquisition Regulation was amended to include the "rule of two or more" standard. The document also discussed the balance between business efficiency and meeting socio-economic goals in federal procurement.</dc:description></oai_dc:dc>