<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Memo: Why ADA and 504 Might Be Called: "The State &amp; Local Government Disability Relief and Flexibility Act"</dc:title><dc:date>1994-12-30</dc:date><dc:creator>Vachon, Alexander</dc:creator><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:identifier>http://congressarchives.org/record/c021_001_002_026</dc:identifier><dc:description>Some believe the ADA is "unfunded" and will cause undue burdens to states and municipalities. The ADA and Section 506 of the 1976 Rehabilitation Act have financial protection for state and municipalities and there's potential to earmark federal funds to subsidize their renovations to become ADA compliant.</dc:description></oai_dc:dc>