<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<items xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/">
  <item>
    <dcterms:provenance>Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK</dcterms:provenance>
    <dcterms:title>Understanding the US Government's Appropriation System for Research Projects: A Letter Exchange</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:date>1973-01-01</dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:created>1973-01-01</dcterms:created>
    <dcterms:creator>unknown</dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/</dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:language>eng</dcterms:language>
    <dcterms:temporal>93rd (1973-1975)</dcterms:temporal>
    <dcterms:relation>James R. Jones Collection</dcterms:relation>
    <dcterms:isPartOf>CAC_CC_109_4_0000, Box 22, Folder 28, University of Oklahoma, Carl Albert Center Archives, Norman, OK, Standard Shelving</dcterms:isPartOf>
    <dcterms:source>https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/resources/70</dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:identifier>CAC_CC_109_4_22_28_0031</dcterms:identifier>
    <edm:preview>https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/James%20R.%20Jones%20Collection/James%20R.%20Jones%20Correspondence%20Series,%201968-1986%20/CAC_CC_109_4_22_1_0000-District%20Office,%20Jones%20Clippings,%201973/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_109_4_22_28_0031_thumbnail.jpg</edm:preview>
    <edm:isShownAt>https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/archival_objects/863989</edm:isShownAt>
    <edm:isShownBy>https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/James%20R.%20Jones%20Collection/James%20R.%20Jones%20Correspondence%20Series,%201968-1986%20/CAC_CC_109_4_22_1_0000-District%20Office,%20Jones%20Clippings,%201973/CAC_CC_109_4_22_28_0031.pdf</edm:isShownBy>
    <dc:type>correspondence</dc:type>
    <dc:subject>Aging--Social aspects; Retirement; Business--United States</dc:subject>
    <dcterms:format>2 Pages</dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:description>The document discusses the United States government's appropriation system for research projects, which involves various agencies and committees holding hearings to determine funding for projects. The document acknowledges that there may be duplications and over or under funding, but emphasizes the importance of careful scrutiny of research projects by multiple individuals and committees. The writer suggests the need for a centralized organization to oversee research funding to prevent fragmentation and improve accountability.</dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:type>Text</dcterms:type>
  </item>
</items>
