Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK Opinions on Measures: City Tulsa Ballot No. 136 1945-01-01 1945-01-01 unknown http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/ eng 79th (1945-1947) George B. Schwabe Collection CAC_CC_47_1_0000, Box 6, Folder 59, University of Oklahoma, Carl Albert Center Archives, Norman, OK, Standard Shelving https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/resources/37 CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0006 https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/George%20B.%20Schwabe%20Collection%20/CAC_CC_047_1_0000_0000_0000-79th%20Congress,%201945-1947/CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0000-Small%20Business,%201946/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0006_thumbnail.jpg https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/archival_objects/873298 https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/George%20B.%20Schwabe%20Collection%20/CAC_CC_047_1_0000_0000_0000-79th%20Congress,%201945-1947/CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0000-Small%20Business,%201946/CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0006.pdf correspondence Business--United States; Commerce 16 Pages Various individuals express their opinions on different measures, such as government exporting American products for relief, government surplus goods for veterans, and subsidizing production of pre-fab houses. Some are in favor, some are against, and some choose not to vote on certain measures. The Federation is mentioned as not being subsidized. Text Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK The Battle for Patents: A Call for Caution and Innovation 1945-02-17 1945-02-17 unknown http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/ eng 79th (1945-1947) George B. Schwabe Collection CAC_CC_47_1_0000, Box 6, Folder 4, University of Oklahoma, Carl Albert Center Archives, Norman, OK, Standard Shelving https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/resources/37 CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0003 https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/George%20B.%20Schwabe%20Collection%20/CAC_CC_047_1_0000_0000_0000-79th%20Congress,%201945-1947/CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0000-Patents,%201944-1945/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0003_thumbnail.jpg https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/archival_objects/872002 https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/George%20B.%20Schwabe%20Collection%20/CAC_CC_047_1_0000_0000_0000-79th%20Congress,%201945-1947/CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0000-Patents,%201944-1945/CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0003.pdf correspondence Commerce 16 Pages The document discusses the issue of compulsory licensing of patents in the United States. The Anderson Company opposes compulsory licensing, arguing that it would stifle innovation and competition. The Murphy Elevator Company, on the other hand, supports compulsory licensing as a way to stimulate research and industry. The Anderson Company believes that their success and innovations would not have been possible under a compulsory licensing system. The debate highlights differing perspectives on the role of patents in incentivizing innovation. Text